Skip navigation

This is an organization whose members purport to take an active interest in the welfare of those who place their trust in the Roman Catholic Church, but it is clear that it is a purely self-interested group that cares far more about how it looks to the outside world than caring for those who follow it. If there are two things I would ask the pope were I allowed this, they would be these:

1. Why on earth would you lie about condoms not being an effective public health care policy in the fight to stop the spread of AIDS in Africa?
2. Why is it that it is secular institutions – and not the Church – which creates public and open inquiries into the alarmingly large number of cases of sexual abuse by priests?

To Catholics who might read this, I ask: Do you feel safe allowing priests around your children without supervision? And don’t give me the lame “Oh, but the priests at our parish would never do that”. Parents of children who were abused thought that too. And the even more lame “Only a small percentage of priests commit the crime of pedophilia” doesn’t wash either. Why put your children unnecessarily in harm’s way? Why enter a lottery you don’t want to win?

We’ve seen a pope who, while known as Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (archbishop of Munich), approved treatment of confessed child abuser Peter Hullerman and then simply returned him to active duty as a priest. Six years later Hullerman began a prison sentence for child molestation. A decade later, while Ratzinger was head of the Vatican office charged with investigating accusations of pedophilia (once called the Inquisition, no less), intervened in the defrocking of Lawrence Murphy who sexually assaulted 200 boys at a Wisconsin school for the deaf. Two hundred! Murphy wrote to Ratzinger pleading “I simply want to live out the time that I have left in the dignity of my priesthood.” Ratzinger, showing vastly more consideration to this monster than to its victims, complied. Murphy spent not one day in court, let alone prison, for his heinous crimes. The man who would be pope took away even the meager justice of defrocking from those Murphy assaulted. No closure for the victims yet again. Ratzinger similarly resisted defrocking California priest Stephen Kiesle, urging “as much paternal care as possible” for the sexual predator. Kiesle began serving a six-year sentence in 2004 and is a registered sex offender.

More recently, the Vatican has finally said law enforcement should be notified. “Civil law concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should always be followed,” the Vatican guidelines said. Ya think? Why did any of these bishops need to be told this in the first place?

Jeffrey Lena, the Vatican’s U.S. attorney, has argued that there was nothing in the canon law that guides the church that precluded reporting.

“It’s beyond dispute that the canon law does not mandate non-reporting,” he said. “These guidelines may help clarify that point for people who are less familiar with canon law.”

Let me say something here: When it comes to reporting crimes – especially those involving abuse! – why the fuck would anyone even consider “canon law”? Who cares? This is exactly the kind of thinking that got the Vatican into this mess in the first place! And why is it that where a physician has knowledge or or even suspects incidents of sexual or physical abuse is mandated BY LAW to notify law enforcement agencies and the clergy is not? That must change. The Church has policed itself for far too long and is completely unworthy of any trust in this matter.

And now some high-up clown in a funny hat, the Vatican’s Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone has come out to say that it is homosexuality and not celibacy that is to blame…

“Many psychologists and psychiatrists have demonstrated that there is no relation between celibacy and pedophilia. But many others have demonstrated, I have been told recently, that there is a relation between homosexuality and pedophilia. That is true,” he told a news conference. “That is the problem.”

Let me get this straight… He was told this so it must be true? Told by who? What published studies can he point to which actually show a link between homosexuality and pedophilia? These people must get stoned on all that incense.

Nor is this at all relevant. I wouldn’t care if there were indeed a relationship (there’s not) between the two. This is a smoke screen. The problem lies with covering up sexual assault and not dealing properly with those committing the crimes. Heck, they coddle them. There is only one appropriate and morally justifiable action to take, and it’s nothing to do with the centuries old “how will the Church look”. The perpetrators must be brought to justice for the sake of the victims and the victims themselves aided through their pain. Defrocking is an afterthought. It’s not even a real punishment.

Robert Cornellier, whose brother was assaulted in the 70’s has some great advice. In a Canada AM interview, he said

“It’s a PR reaction because the world is reacting to what has come out in the past weeks,” he told Canada AM from Montreal. “I say to the victims, don’t go to the bishop or the clergy, go to the police, that’s the only way people can get some kind of justice”

Amen. This is particularly relevant in light of the FACT that children in Ireland who were abused were coerced into vows of silence. The head of the Catholic Church in Ireland – Cardinal Sean Brady – was present during these blatant attempts at hiding these crimes. This link has an overview of allegations of abuse and cover-up in a number of countries. The sheer magnitude of the whole thing when seen together like this makes me sick.

And now it’s the media’s fault. An interesting defence. Is it the media’s fault that priests assaulted children? No. Is it the media’s fault that the Church failed in its moral duties to bring these cases to light and willingly make restitution to the victims? No. And the pope’s weak apologies are hardly worth mentioning. Much more than an mere apology is needed. “So sorry. Too bad you are going through a rough spot. Stiff upper lip, old chap! Ta ta!” I sense nothing sincere or contrite in the pope’s apologies.

I’m not talking necessarily about financial restitution, though that should be an option. Counseling for the victims – no matter how long ago the assault occurred! – would be nice. And these should be given without resorting to legal action. Getting anything out of the Church – no matter what its representatives did to their victims – shouldn’t be like a modern-day Sisyphus story thousands of times retold.

A recent Vatican editorial says the claims were an “ignoble” attack on the Pope and there was no “cover-up”. I don’t actually believe that there was a cover-up in the sense that there was some arch-conspiracy from the get-go. I do think that there were many incidents of cover-ups resulting from a shared mindset that the image of the Church was paramount, even over the welfare of those its representatives harmed. And that is where the insidiousness of all this lies. While it may not be written down anywhere, it is a de facto doctrine that how the Church looks takes precedence rather than the welfare of its flock. This leads to poor and sometimes criminal actions aside from the sexual assaults by officers of the Church. To describe them as “well-meaning” would be misguided and can only be viewed as such from within the Church itself, not from outside. It’s just another (and ongoing) example of how religion poisons everything. But to say that the pope was not involved and didn’t share this mindset that pervades the church hierarchy is demonstrably nonsense. I urge the Vatican to get out of this damage control activity and just do right by those it wronged.



  1. All too true, SA. They just need to do the right thing – damn the religion. You would think with something as blatant as child abuse, the right thing would be clear.

    • You would think, indeed. But we’re not sharing their delusion, so who can say? But why is it that the Church must be dragged kicking and screaming by (ironically) secular authority to make ammends? Why can’t they do it – if they indeed hold the moral high ground – of their own volition because it is the right thing to do? I just don’t get that, and that is why I condemn the Vatican without reservation. Demeaning victims by claiming the documented accusation that the pope himself interfered with defrocking pedophile priests (as if this were at all justice) is “idle gossip” is unconscionable. He might as well be unzipping his pants in front of assault victims for another go-round. Perhaps they should look to themselves to point the blame at and not the media. The media is just doing its job.

      Every night it seems there is yet another news story on how the Vatican is in damage control mode instead of doing right by those its representatives have harmed. It’s hard to keep up with it all, and it infuriates me.

        • pkboomer
        • Posted April 14, 2010 at 3:09 pm
        • Permalink

        Just when I think the pope has said the stupidest, cruelest and most ignorant thing yet, he goes and outdoes himself. He’s the petty one.

  2. I thought the actual term used was “petty gossip” but maybe that’s just an artifact of translation.

  3. I don’t, by and large, have a problem with religion on an individual scale–but the Vatican drives me up a damn wall, even moreso than America’s own evangelical (cough) leaders.

    I’m infuriated that they tried to dump this off on homosexuals; pedophiles are *rapists*, which means they have more in common with straight males than homosexuals. (Cos most rapists are straight males, I mean. Love my straight males out there. As long as you’re not rapists.) I’m infuriated that they’re more concerned with how they look than what they do–that’s some church for you! And I’m infuriated that people who DO go to the local police to report the rape will be completely and utterly blocked by the Church to investigate, despite what the Vatican says about reporting it.

    What year is it in the Vatican? Because out here, we’re no longer in the Dark Ages where the Church is the highest authority.

    • That’s part of my anger, as well. Ratzi recently apologized for the pedophile priest, but he just doesn’t get it. It was not just that there were/are still bad priests within the Catholic Church. It’s what church authorities did to hide the problem. Ratzi has never apologized for this nor have they been held to account for it. Some of these priests assaulted hundreds of alter boys, and Ratzi himself has interfered with the punishment of at least one such individual.

      Pedophilia is not about homosexuality. It is about power. The sex of the victim isn’t relevant to them. What gets these sickos off is being in a position of power over them. And the Church’s response was to move the perpetrator to fresh hunting grounds. That’s a REWARD, not a punishment.

      Had church authorities immediately involved law enforcement in every case – you know, as in “doing the right thing” – this would have blown over long ago.

      A little thought experiment puts this whole thing into perspective. What happens when a public school teacher is accused of sexual misconduct? First, the teacher is immediately removed from any access to children and the police notified.

      What did we get from the Church? Obfuscation and obstruction of justice on a world-wide scale. The Pope is already known to be a liar from his comments on condoms spreading AIDS in Africa. Now he’ll be known as the type of guy who hides pedophiles. I have no patience for anything the Vatican spews forth from its mouthpieces or anyone who listens in agreement.

      As Tim Minchin’s song says, “Fuck the motherfucking Pope.”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: